↓ Skip to main content

Innovative use of data sources: a cross-sectional study of data linkage and artificial intelligence practices across European countries

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Public Health, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Innovative use of data sources: a cross-sectional study of data linkage and artificial intelligence practices across European countries
Published in
Archives of Public Health, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13690-020-00436-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Romana Haneef, Marie Delnord, Michel Vernay, Emmanuelle Bauchet, Rita Gaidelyte, Herman Van Oyen, Zeynep Or, Beatriz Pérez-Gómez, Luigi Palmieri, Peter Achterberg, Mariken Tijhuis, Metka Zaletel, Stefan Mathis-Edenhofer, Ondřej Májek, Håkon Haaheim, Hanna Tolonen, Anne Gallay

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Master 6 9%
Researcher 5 7%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 31 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 15%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 33 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,434,534
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Public Health
#275
of 1,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,335
of 436,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Public Health
#13
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.