↓ Skip to main content

Lay and scientific categorizations of new breeding techniques: Implications for food policy and genetically modified organism legislation

Overview of attention for article published in Public Understanding of Science, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lay and scientific categorizations of new breeding techniques: Implications for food policy and genetically modified organism legislation
Published in
Public Understanding of Science, June 2020
DOI 10.1177/0963662520929668
Authors

Gervaise Debucquet, Régis Baron, Mireille Cardinal

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,445,918
of 15,462,738 outputs
Outputs from Public Understanding of Science
#603
of 836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,959
of 205,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Understanding of Science
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,462,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.