RT @JKSteinberger: I know people like to play the "who to blame" game, and industry, capitalism, growth, the wealthy, etc are most to blame…
RT @JKSteinberger: I know people like to play the "who to blame" game, and industry, capitalism, growth, the wealthy, etc are most to blame…
RT @JKSteinberger: I know people like to play the "who to blame" game, and industry, capitalism, growth, the wealthy, etc are most to blame…
RT @JKSteinberger: I know people like to play the "who to blame" game, and industry, capitalism, growth, the wealthy, etc are most to blame…
'Any transition towards sustainability can only be effective if far-reaching lifestyle changes complement technological advancements'. Have you started changing your lifestyle? https://t.co/08nAsGbZpU
RT @JKSteinberger: I know people like to play the "who to blame" game, and industry, capitalism, growth, the wealthy, etc are most to blame…
RT @JKSteinberger: I know people like to play the "who to blame" game, and industry, capitalism, growth, the wealthy, etc are most to blame…
RT @JKSteinberger: I know people like to play the "who to blame" game, and industry, capitalism, growth, the wealthy, etc are most to blame…
RT @JKSteinberger: I know people like to play the "who to blame" game, and industry, capitalism, growth, the wealthy, etc are most to blame…
RT @JKSteinberger: I know people like to play the "who to blame" game, and industry, capitalism, growth, the wealthy, etc are most to blame…
RT @JKSteinberger: I know people like to play the "who to blame" game, and industry, capitalism, growth, the wealthy, etc are most to blame…
I know people like to play the "who to blame" game, and industry, capitalism, growth, the wealthy, etc are most to blame. I do it too. https://t.co/S4Ydj11eyy But. Still. No one is forcing ANYONE to drive an SUV or guzzle meat or fly to fucking wherever
@wuest23 @crisortunity ...and I'll just throw this in for a different dimension of this same issue: https://t.co/QcMGxJJmgo
@flowinguphill @CoryCopelandH2O The affluent top consumers of the world need to consume *significantly* less. The global increase in human population is not the root of the problem. It’s the systems put in place by the affluent to extract resources from ev
@Karmageddon67 @jamesecology @RightsResources @kundan_kumarkun You're still here? It's easy to blame other people which is what your posts have done rather then look at the affluence of your own society and how that exports impacts. Rights to nature have
"The affluent citizens of the world are responsible for most environmental impacts and are central to any future prospect of retreating to safer environmental conditions. "
RT @HakonNordhagen: «affluent households worldwide is by far the strongest determinant and the strongest accelerator of increases of global…
RT @HakonNordhagen: «affluent households worldwide is by far the strongest determinant and the strongest accelerator of increases of global…
RT @HakonNordhagen: «affluent households worldwide is by far the strongest determinant and the strongest accelerator of increases of global…
«affluent households worldwide is by far the strongest determinant and the strongest accelerator of increases of global environmental and social impacts.» The affluent are the true defenders of status quo. https://t.co/ZwILuq9gHC
@ProfPaulWelfens @Fawksify @TerliWetter Haben Sie sich damit schon befasst? https://t.co/lv55BE5Vb8
Scientists’ Warning on Affluence https://t.co/V8QzwSeSI8 #Scientists #Warning #Affluence
@BoudewijnC @marjanminnesma @MinisterKenE @SigridKaag Hoewel vliegen door kleine elite wordt gebezigd is het maar liefst 3,5% van de oorzaak van klimaatcrisis. Uitstoot broeikasgassen in hogere luchtlagen verdubbeld impact. Wat rijke deel van de wereldbevo
@berglund_oscar @schipper_lisa @JoelMCurzon @theresphysics @NiranjanAjit @MorganHPhillips @KetanJ0 @JKSteinberger @rpancost @NaomiAKlein @NaomiOreskes You can find Prof. @JKSteinberger et al discussing the impact of affluence here: https://t.co/EdtsvAcxG
@e_reesch @Sanderturnhout @janrotmans @LSchreinemacher @SandraPellegrom @jasonhickel En dat doen we niet omdat politici en beleidsmakers 🐘🐘 in de kamer niet benoemen: Koloniale karakter klimaatprobleem: https://t.co/HSJHZjOrEp Focus op meer 💰💰: https://t.c
@casadosanti Acá deje varias referencias. Se me ocurre que si abris el segundo, podes luego profundizar en su bibliografia citada y en trabajos posteriores que citen a ese trabajo. https://t.co/rLoDOmH5ke
Comparto algunas referencias sobre el tema: - https://t.co/9fXgEZ9dRx - https://t.co/tMbNXKF9FN - https://t.co/ay43SOPhtX - https://t.co/FmqHRV25K0 - https://t.co/lVUm1o4JZt - https://t.co/EjaHJC5Z68 - https://t.co/IlpvjyIyGA - https://t.co/tYmhiO0moB
@BrunoVuan @McAffee Resources are controlled by physics & thermodynamics, not human technology. E.g., you can't project a more intensive food supply without projecting demand for phosphate rock & energy -- which that MIT study clearly failed to do
RT @parents4future: "Scientists’ warning on affluence" by @t_wiedmann Manfred Lenzen @LorenzClimate @JKSteinberger ▶️ https://t.co/l8N1Hd…
RT @parents4future: "Scientists’ warning on affluence" by @t_wiedmann Manfred Lenzen @LorenzClimate @JKSteinberger ▶️ https://t.co/l8N1Hd…
RT @JuanRodrigezma1: @JosTrigo8 @JulenBollain ¿Por qué será que a la izquierda le preocupa tanto que unas pocas personas tengan tanto poder…
@ChristophHorst3 @FabianLaasch Das mit dem Ressourcen schonen klappt aber bisher nicht. https://t.co/lv55BE5Vb8
RT @rationalsc: @JoshuaPotash Scientists' warning on affluence https://t.co/dkzck7qsoA
RT @rationalsc: @JoshuaPotash Scientists' warning on affluence https://t.co/dkzck7qsoA
RT @rationalsc: @JoshuaPotash Scientists' warning on affluence https://t.co/dkzck7qsoA
RT @rationalsc: @JoshuaPotash Scientists' warning on affluence https://t.co/dkzck7qsoA
RT @rationalsc: @JoshuaPotash Scientists' warning on affluence https://t.co/dkzck7qsoA
RT @rationalsc: @JoshuaPotash Scientists' warning on affluence https://t.co/dkzck7qsoA
RT @rationalsc: @JoshuaPotash Scientists' warning on affluence https://t.co/dkzck7qsoA
RT @rationalsc: @JoshuaPotash Scientists' warning on affluence https://t.co/dkzck7qsoA
RT @rationalsc: @JoshuaPotash Scientists' warning on affluence https://t.co/dkzck7qsoA
RT @rationalsc: @JoshuaPotash Scientists' warning on affluence https://t.co/dkzck7qsoA
@JoshuaPotash Scientists' warning on affluence https://t.co/dkzck7qsoA
RT @JulianCribb: Scientists’ warning on affluence | Nature Communications https://t.co/AxISA3JjFE
RT @JulianCribb: Scientists’ warning on affluence | Nature Communications https://t.co/AxISA3JjFE
RT @JulianCribb: Scientists’ warning on affluence | Nature Communications https://t.co/AxISA3JjFE
RT @JulianCribb: Scientists’ warning on affluence | Nature Communications https://t.co/AxISA3JjFE
RT @JulianCribb: Scientists’ warning on affluence | Nature Communications https://t.co/AxISA3JjFE
@Mon4Kooyong @zalisteggall Scientists’ warning on affluence | Nature Communications https://t.co/KCx3DxiK1u
@AlboMP @gedkearney @SenatorWong @tanya_plibersek @AdamBandt @LaTrioli @Raf_Epstein @realCarrickRyan @barriecassidy Scientists’ warning on affluence | Nature Communications https://t.co/KCx3DxiK1u
RT @JulianCribb: Scientists’ warning on affluence | Nature Communications https://t.co/AxISA3JjFE
RT @Karmageddon67: #BullshitScience “The majority of studies agree that by far the major drivers of global impacts are technological chan…
RT @Karmageddon67: #BullshitScience “The majority of studies agree that by far the major drivers of global impacts are technological chan…
RT @louisviljee: #SystemChange, not #ClimateChange #ClimateAction #ClimateSolutions up to every one of us. #EcologicalEmergency #ClimateEm…
#SystemChange, not #ClimateChange #ClimateAction #ClimateSolutions up to every one of us. #EcologicalEmergency #ClimateEmergency #ClimateSolutions
RT @Karmageddon67: #BullshitScience “The majority of studies agree that by far the major drivers of global impacts are technological chan…
Scientists’ warning on affluence | Nature Communications https://t.co/AxISA3JjFE
Someone try to tell me that science is not corrupted by ideologists & vested interests, and that all scientists are completely objective. Even papers in “Nature” somehow get BS past peer review. @peakDecisions @OSullivan_Jane @hkopnina @SirAbegao @Eco
#BullshitScience “The majority of studies agree that by far the major drivers of global impacts are technological change and per-capita consumption. [11]” Citing just one paper which did not even consider population as a driver of global impacts. htt
@sunlorrie https://t.co/3c7FfnakFB Here's the article on affluence!
RT @ThierryAaron: @Steven17196286 @ScientistRebel1 @GretaThunberg No true... "The affluent citizens of the world are responsible for most…
RT @ThierryAaron: @Steven17196286 @ScientistRebel1 @GretaThunberg No true... "The affluent citizens of the world are responsible for most…
RT @ThierryAaron: @Steven17196286 @ScientistRebel1 @GretaThunberg No true... "The affluent citizens of the world are responsible for most…
RT @ThierryAaron: @Steven17196286 @ScientistRebel1 @GretaThunberg No true... "The affluent citizens of the world are responsible for most…
RT @ThierryAaron: @Steven17196286 @ScientistRebel1 @GretaThunberg No true... "The affluent citizens of the world are responsible for most…
RT @ThierryAaron: @Steven17196286 @ScientistRebel1 @GretaThunberg No true... "The affluent citizens of the world are responsible for most…
RT @ThierryAaron: @Steven17196286 @ScientistRebel1 @GretaThunberg No true... "The affluent citizens of the world are responsible for most…
RT @ThierryAaron: @Steven17196286 @ScientistRebel1 @GretaThunberg No true... "The affluent citizens of the world are responsible for most…
@Steven17196286 @ScientistRebel1 @GretaThunberg No true... "The affluent citizens of the world are responsible for most environmental impacts and are central to any future prospect of retreating to safer environmental conditions" https://t.co/t7hkaGArOI
@moi_o_see @dwallacewells Of course, what's missing from all of that is the long-standing body of academic research on #degrowth and ecological limits. If your only metric is carbon, you will never solve the ecological crisis: https://t.co/QcMGxJJmgo
Read the article here: “Consumption is by far the strongest determinant of global impacts, dwarfing other socio-economic–demographic factors”. /4 https://t.co/zOoriKhfQ0
@glucksritter @der_veganer @MoinAlice @zen_garten @JaneDoe66788641 Die Unternehmen führen Buch, werten Kaufverhalten & Profit aus und passen ihr Angebot entsprechend an. Das wirkt sich zukünftig auf die Produktion aus. Jeder Kauf ist eine Wahl bei der
RT @LorenzClimate: 'Scientists' warning on affluence' out now @NatureComms: 1) Global affluent responsible for most env. impacts 2) There i…
RT @OscarPuiggene: The era of blaming the individual's choices must end now. We need systems change. We need governments and public institu…
The era of blaming the individual's choices must end now. We need systems change. We need governments and public institutions to take action. Our greed for more money is eating us (and our fellow species in the planet) alive. Mind (for once) the (environme
RT @pape_lapapp: Auch dass Ungleichheit und exzessive Emissionen fest zusammenhängen ist klar. https://t.co/4kZDyrdlVI
RT @pape_lapapp: Auch dass Ungleichheit und exzessive Emissionen fest zusammenhängen ist klar. https://t.co/4kZDyrdlVI
Auch dass Ungleichheit und exzessive Emissionen fest zusammenhängen ist klar. https://t.co/4kZDyrdlVI
@Isabel_Schnabel Inwieweit hast du dich mit der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema befasst? https://t.co/lv55BE5Vb8
RT @eroston: The real world is throwing our way harder and harder questions, such as this 2020 brain-teaser. https://t.co/Z1vLlLd5pa https…
RT @eroston: The real world is throwing our way harder and harder questions, such as this 2020 brain-teaser. https://t.co/Z1vLlLd5pa https…
RT @eroston: The real world is throwing our way harder and harder questions, such as this 2020 brain-teaser. https://t.co/Z1vLlLd5pa https…
RT @eroston: The real world is throwing our way harder and harder questions, such as this 2020 brain-teaser. https://t.co/Z1vLlLd5pa https…
RT @LorenzClimate: Very excited about this presentation & discussion about #degrowth! Come around if you are interested in the paper on 1.5…
RT @LorenzClimate: Very excited about this presentation & discussion about #degrowth! Come around if you are interested in the paper on 1.5…
RT @LorenzClimate: Very excited about this presentation & discussion about #degrowth! Come around if you are interested in the paper on 1.5…
RT @LorenzClimate: Very excited about this presentation & discussion about #degrowth! Come around if you are interested in the paper on 1.5…
RT @LorenzClimate: Very excited about this presentation & discussion about #degrowth! Come around if you are interested in the paper on 1.5…
Very excited about this presentation & discussion about #degrowth! Come around if you are interested in the paper on 1.5°C & degrowth (https://t.co/J3iTdjqkjX) &/or the warning on affluence (https://t.co/zjo22VmNAQ). Thanks to @SSC_ETHZ &
RT @de_bose: @Climate24877412 We all hypocritically talk about climate (and debt) risk, while buying a $1M house, 8-seaters 4WD and leavin…
@Climate24877412 We all hypocritically talk about climate (and debt) risk, while buying a $1M house, 8-seaters 4WD and leaving a massive waste-trail of needless affluence / convenience Just hope that Elon Musk gets a bit spiritual while going after Mars.
@ZuckerbergMeta Majority of these “green jobs” are surfacing due to ESG mandates. As the current version of capitalism (will continue for another 400Y of Asian empires) is primarily centred on affluence & consumption, environmental issues will contin
This paper got me thinking about an old mural at CoRK https://t.co/PlYQTcU4zO https://t.co/wyPc0c0LpT
@CaesareWepunkt @SePlo73 Bisher sind die Ingenieure nicht hinterher gekommen. https://t.co/lv55BE5Vb8 Wenn degrowth für arme Länder keine Lösung, globales Wachstum aber gefährlich ist, stellt sich die Frage, was das für reiche Länder bedeutet.