@JeppeDruedahl Prøv at tjekke de her studier, de siger lidt noget andet. Men det er super fede studier, I promise! Kubiscewski https://t.co/bPx2gFYmJO Vogel https://t.co/4Ctd9HuDJW O’Neill https://t.co/tPU5ffmULZ Wiedenhofer https://t.co/OLZrREzoAF Millwar
@ClimateDad77 From this: https://t.co/j1SebTAAda
@lansbergen64 @op1npo @EOnl Wat is je voorstel Ton? Ik denk condooms uitdelen in het westen. Onze consumptie per persoon heeft een bizarre vlucht genomen in een paar jaar, dát is het probleem https://t.co/mTz857LnA9
@lalo_fello @El_Chamuco @monerorape @monerohernandez @fisgonmonero Aquí puedes ver datos internacionales y nacionales de economía-ecología: https://t.co/daXEsgaPDr Emisiones de las élites: https://t.co/VSY0y0QBPH https://t.co/MNk1udC91r https://t.co/Hzww
RT @deadward_: "The evidence is clear. Long-term and concurrent human and planetary wellbeing will not be achieved in the Anthropocene if a…
@jvarchitect @CarlosMaslaton Malthusianismo? Ja, ni ahí, chabón. Es mucho más rico el argumento. Pero no es reducible a un meme. https://t.co/PmJAf3e024
RT @NLRebellion: De wetenschap is helder: overbodige luxeconsumptie door een kleine mondiale elite is de grootste oorzaak van de klimaat- e…
RT @NLRebellion: De wetenschap is helder: overbodige luxeconsumptie door een kleine mondiale elite is de grootste oorzaak van de klimaat- e…
RT @NLRebellion: De wetenschap is helder: overbodige luxeconsumptie door een kleine mondiale elite is de grootste oorzaak van de klimaat- e…
RT @NLRebellion: De wetenschap is helder: overbodige luxeconsumptie door een kleine mondiale elite is de grootste oorzaak van de klimaat- e…
RT @NLRebellion: De wetenschap is helder: overbodige luxeconsumptie door een kleine mondiale elite is de grootste oorzaak van de klimaat- e…
De wetenschap is helder: overbodige luxeconsumptie door een kleine mondiale elite is de grootste oorzaak van de klimaat- en ecologische crisis. Deze crisis treft mensen in het Mondiale Zuiden het meest, terwijl zij er nauwelijks aan bijdragen. [2/7] https:
@BjellandEriksen Bonuspoeng for begrepsavklaring! Jeg er fortsatt uenig med konklusjonen. For å sitere denne artikkelen: "Since the level of consumption determines total impacts, affluence needs to be addressed by reducing consumption, not just greening it
@EmilyKerr36 Yet again we see the rich driving (excuse the pun) the highest environmental impacts. https://t.co/EdtsvAcxGd
RT @EcofriendlyBeer: "#Consumption, and to a lesser extent #population growth, have mostly outrun any beneficial effects of changes in #tec…
I like how this diagram looks like a doughnut. https://t.co/7dDeMCg0mn https://t.co/r1xb1zahG2
"highly affluent consumers drive biophysical resource use (a) directly through high consumption, (b) as members of powerful factions of the capitalist class and (c) through driving consumption norms across the population." https://t.co/7dDeMCg0mn
"#Consumption, and to a lesser extent #population growth, have mostly outrun any beneficial effects of changes in #technology over the past few decades. These results hold for the entire world." https://t.co/6B12t9Jngk
RT @NafeezAhmed: One of the best studies I've seen is this one, which sets out in detail how a total restructuring of the economy, 40% redu…
One of the best studies I've seen is this one, which sets out in detail how a total restructuring of the economy, 40% reduction in growth and high technology deployment can support a larger population within planetary boundaries https://t.co/PIbCExablr
@Chantal_Leest @EsoClose @WRRDenktank Ja. Want arme huishoudens spenderen überhaupt minder en stoten daardoor minder broeikasgassen uit. Wees zuinig op gevoel van efficacy bij rijkere middenlaag: https://t.co/mTz857LnA9 En om die dan het signaal te geven '
@annajanejoyner @goodenergystory Those people need to use that voice, advocacy and leverage for climate. “Caring about climate” means nothing if wealth and privilege aren’t used to reduce harm. Billionaires don’t get a free pass because they’re young, pr
@catalfonsoparra no me voy a enganchar con ataques ad hominem. 1- yo estoy mostrando tasas que muestran velocidades de crecimiento. el documento que pone no conozco, acá van algunas cosas para leer: https://t.co/UBYlon0ImC https://t.co/Lo0YJjOF01
@Artoek @ton_aarts @werthernieland @steviedubyu hoezo moeten die rijke huishoudens zoet gehouden worden? Die zitten ook op de A12 hoor. Helft NLders wil structurele oplossingen https://t.co/OveNVXAL2D Elke ton vermeden CO2 telt. Vooral rijke mensen moeten
5. Adaptacja edukacji i transferu wiedzy w celu wspierania inicjatyw obywatelskich i lokalnej samowystarczalności. Cały artykuł przeczytacie na stronie: https://t.co/5QYqigse1q 8/8
@mouse_math https://t.co/Shm0TGQMGL Key takeaway: Global GDP and global resource use are tightly coupled, with no decoupling of those in sight! End of story! xD https://t.co/fSGjBCgaS8
@MagnusBarsoe Hvorfor skal ALLE kritikere af degrowth partout karikere positionen totalt? Og hvornår begynder I at forholde jer til det, vi faktisk ved om den stærke sammenhæng mellem real global BNP-vækst og negativ miljøpåvirkning? https://t.co/1DcfrPNv
@tallrite @mattwridley No, not all. Rich people. https://t.co/PmJAf3exRC https://t.co/hHbWtPxm0B
@GeraldDurden @CollapseDiaries It's all so very simple. Humans want stuff. Stuff requires matter and energy. We can measure stuff as per GDP - crude, but it gets the job done. GDP scales with matter. No surprise. More stuff? More matter! https://t.co/Shm0T
@Peters_Glen Mind, material use and GDP are tightly coupled. https://t.co/Shm0TGQMGL So at 3% global GDP growth p.a., you would have to double global carbon supply every ~20 years. https://t.co/S3jDPxfMAb
@egberts_ellen @Andr16148308 @JeroenBee1 Dat is echt onzin. De rijkste mensen hebben de grootste voetafdruk: https://t.co/mTz857LnA9 Er is genoeg voor iedereen als we eerlijk delen. https://t.co/X9JtlSmu9v Mensen in het westen willen best een stap terug
@herbivore_club @Sashkapapashka https://t.co/Shm0TGQMGL Behold the amazing decoupling of global GDP and global resource use! https://t.co/Kti8Ubd9IJ
RT @kacperen: “The affluent citizens of the world are responsible for most environmental impacts and are central to any future prospect of…
RT @kacperen: “The affluent citizens of the world are responsible for most environmental impacts and are central to any future prospect of…
RT @socjalistyczna: 5. Adaptacja edukacji i transferu wiedzy w celu wspierania inicjatyw obywatelskich i lokalnej samowystarczalności. Całą…
RT @kacperen: “The affluent citizens of the world are responsible for most environmental impacts and are central to any future prospect of…
“The affluent citizens of the world are responsible for most environmental impacts and are central to any future prospect of retreating to safer environmental conditions.” https://t.co/IxZ8AikApa
5. Adaptacja edukacji i transferu wiedzy w celu wspierania inicjatyw obywatelskich i lokalnej samowystarczalności. Całą analizę przeczytacie na stronie: https://t.co/5QYqigse1q 8/8
@martincollignon @FrederikSandby @MortenLond @concitoinfo Tænkte det nok… Fortællingen om, at reel, hurtig, global omstilling kan gennemføres fra en normaldansk komfortzone savner belæg. Det er mest af alt bare det sædvanlige verdensfjerne økonomgøgl. http
@gjk100 @Glazertwalker @yanisvaroufakis AND YET, Natalism isn’t the answer either, because an aging population is also very Affluent. Speaking of BURDEN, the real burden are the fucking RICH. https://t.co/PmJAf3e024
@elonmusk We just reached 8 billion. And the quality of life for the immense majority is awful, and only going to get worse, because -cough- affluence. https://t.co/PmJAf3e024
We just reached 8 billion. And the quality of life for the immense majority is awful, and only going to get worse, because -cough- affluence. https://t.co/PmJAf3e024
@LLBroadwell @adrianbowyer Even you, who in your thread cover all the basics 👍, don’t seem to address the multiplying factors of it all: population and affluence (rich consumers). If those two do not decrease, it’s all gonna be bandaids over exposed fractu
@Dursten Det kommer vel an på, hvad man mener med “dyr”. Hvis påstanden er, at danskerne vil kunne opretholde materiel levestandard, og mange flere globalt vil kunne komme på samme niveau, tror jeg, du tager fejl. https://t.co/5Jry5SO2u2 https://t.co/1Dc
@FritJylland @SlothKristian @L_Aagaard Der er NUL forskningsbelæg for, at ny tech kan nulstille termodynamikkens anden lov. Vi kan vælge imellem fortsat at følge vores barnlige begær ELLER at bevare en menneske-egnet planet. https://t.co/5Jry5SO2u2
@MichaelGeyer89 @Frei_Fink Und trotzdem bedeutet BIP-Wachstum bislang steigender Ressourcenverbrauch. https://t.co/lv55BE5Vb8 https://t.co/utmh8mPK2G
@kristianleth Vi må holde fast i det globale perspektiv OG se det bredere end klima, og her er decoupling meget langt væk. Af gode termodynamiske grunde. Kan vi kan producere og forbruge i det nuværende tempo uden at smadre både klima og økosystemer? Ny te
@pkruseandersen Hvis vi ser bort fra, at selv dét er tvivlsomt - hvor meget mening giver det så at tale om “grøn vækst I DANMARK”? Vi skal bruge globale løsninger. Termodynamikkens love er ikke rigtig med på jeres økonomfantasier… https://t.co/5Jry5SO2u2 h
Affluence is a problem https://t.co/FcsDtLOKRn The world’s top 10% of income earners are responsible for between 25 and 43% of environmental impact.
@pimarty86 https://t.co/aSjGkOhEzi ´Sciency’ enough?
@Obg1887 Einen groben Überblick für den ersten Einstieg finden Sie hier: https://t.co/lv55BE5Vb8 https://t.co/vd12LygKl0
@Disfosgen @schnellenbachj @FuestClemens Das stimmt so leider nicht. https://t.co/lv55BE5Vb8 https://t.co/TbPrn4zZXH
@ConceptualJames Infinite growth is life. What could go wrong? When we run out of resources here, we'll just mine the moon... then Mars... https://t.co/sYAd6CYITx
@cafreiman @SteveStuWill Also fucking up the planet. https://t.co/PmJAf3e024
@cafreiman @SteveStuWill Luxury and affluence does more harm than good. https://t.co/PmJAf3e024
@TheClimateClown @JoAmsel @BrianKateman @atrembath Here’s an example: “The majority of studies agree that by far the major drivers of global impacts are technological change and per-capita consumption11.” The linked reference did not even look at popula
@BjergM @thorborg Se også: https://t.co/5Jry5SO2u2
@nephologue I'll throw this one in: https://t.co/Shm0TGQMGL
RT @ClimateBen: 🧵3. Measures needed to tackle the overwhelming power of consumption & the economic growth paradigm: 'solution approaches r…
@aventuell @jxn_ofc Im Hinblick auf Ressourcenverbrauch passt das doch. https://t.co/lv55BE6t0G https://t.co/IQeCFyUUcH
@nik_metz @Molokai2410 @FalkenaugeM Wirtschaftsleistung und Ressourcenverbrauch sind nicht entkoppelt. https://t.co/lv55BE5Vb8 https://t.co/4pa2yu4Z8P
@JamesGDyke @nephologue Resource efficiency! Oops: https://t.co/Shm0TGRkwj https://t.co/ykVaSUzVYG
@torstenherbst @fdp Dementsprechend schreiben @LorenzClimate und @JKSteinberger in ihrer lesenswerten Warnung vor materiellem Wohlstand, dass der Emissionshandel auch in der degrowth-bubble Befürworter hat. https://t.co/lv55BE5Vb8 https://t.co/YNDiugIiT6
“The evidence is clear. Long-term and concurrent human and planetary wellbeing will not be achieved in the Anthropocene if affluent overconsumption continues, spurred by economic systems that exploit nature and humans.” https://t.co/67me8d4Gwe
RT @bestqueenliz: @xred413x are three links enough? one is from nature. https://t.co/9A0THcn0cw https://t.co/uz1uZ88dtU https://t.co/vbZ…
RT @bestqueenliz: @xred413x are three links enough? one is from nature. https://t.co/9A0THcn0cw https://t.co/uz1uZ88dtU https://t.co/vbZ…
RT @bestqueenliz: @xred413x are three links enough? one is from nature. https://t.co/9A0THcn0cw https://t.co/uz1uZ88dtU https://t.co/vbZ…
RT @bestqueenliz: @xred413x are three links enough? one is from nature. https://t.co/9A0THcn0cw https://t.co/uz1uZ88dtU https://t.co/vbZ…
RT @bestqueenliz: @xred413x are three links enough? one is from nature. https://t.co/9A0THcn0cw https://t.co/uz1uZ88dtU https://t.co/vbZ…
RT @bestqueenliz: @xred413x are three links enough? one is from nature. https://t.co/9A0THcn0cw https://t.co/uz1uZ88dtU https://t.co/vbZ…
RT @bestqueenliz: @xred413x are three links enough? one is from nature. https://t.co/9A0THcn0cw https://t.co/uz1uZ88dtU https://t.co/vbZ…
Abolish. Capitalism.
RT @bestqueenliz: @xred413x are three links enough? one is from nature. https://t.co/9A0THcn0cw https://t.co/uz1uZ88dtU https://t.co/vbZ…
RT @bestqueenliz: @xred413x are three links enough? one is from nature. https://t.co/9A0THcn0cw https://t.co/uz1uZ88dtU https://t.co/vbZ…
RT @bestqueenliz: @xred413x are three links enough? one is from nature. https://t.co/9A0THcn0cw https://t.co/uz1uZ88dtU https://t.co/vbZ…
RT @bestqueenliz: @xred413x are three links enough? one is from nature. https://t.co/9A0THcn0cw https://t.co/uz1uZ88dtU https://t.co/vbZ…
RT @bestqueenliz: @xred413x are three links enough? one is from nature. https://t.co/9A0THcn0cw https://t.co/uz1uZ88dtU https://t.co/vbZ…
RT @bestqueenliz: @xred413x are three links enough? one is from nature. https://t.co/9A0THcn0cw https://t.co/uz1uZ88dtU https://t.co/vbZ…
Link do artykułu w Nature Communications: https://t.co/5QYqigse1q
RT @AgathoniaMedia: #ScientistsWarning on affluence/2020 "The warnings aptly describe the problems, identify population, economic growth a…
#ScientistsWarning on affluence/2020 "The warnings aptly describe the problems, identify population, economic growth and affluence as drivers of unsustainable trends and acknowledge that humanity needs to reassess the role of ... https://t.co/oHOsFzZr2I
@LodeCossaer we hebben in de eerste plaats, veel belangrijker dan efficiëntie, méér sufficiëntie nodig, bij een specifiek deel van de bevolking, zoals beschreven in tal van wetenschappelijke artikels. 1 voorbeeld: Nature: https://t.co/SurfvsLr8W
@SiemDeCleyn @mboudry Welke mensen? Miljoenen zien nu af, onvrijwillig. Niet de mensen met de grootste verantwoordelijkheid, wel hoe lager op de sociale ladder hoe meer. Lees het artikel. De 1 % kan ferm inboeten zonder "afzien" zodat gewone mensen het bet
@latimeralder They're called 'turbines' not 'mills' because they generate electricity not grind corn. Hence why nuclear/coal power stations have a 'turbine hall', not a 'mill hall'. Try reading a leading science journal: https://t.co/QcMGxJJmgo
RT @ThierryAaron: @NiranjanAjit @yl_oswald @dr_anneowen @JKSteinberger @KevinClimate .@t_wiedmann et al also have key ideas... https://t.c…
RT @deadward_: "The evidence is clear. Long-term and concurrent human and planetary wellbeing will not be achieved in the Anthropocene if a…
RT @deadward_: "The evidence is clear. Long-term and concurrent human and planetary wellbeing will not be achieved in the Anthropocene if a…
@janbockaert @JDSchoolmeester @jdceulaer @mohamedouaamari @vljr @bachrouriamir @GodverJory @ThomasRotthier De grafiek die ik tweette was natuurlijk gewoon een illustratie. Daar zitten wel degelijk wetenschappelijke berekeningen achter. Zie https://t.co/IOH
@AlgeMartin @EnergyHuber @fuecks Ich fände es auch deutlich interessanter, wenn z.B. @LorenzClimate an dieser Diskussion teilnehmen würde. https://t.co/lv55BE5Vb8
@Scimitar_SS TL;DR Keynesian economy based on debt & limitless consumption/affluence are root evils. https://t.co/0Cddbyb3Sm Not only rich countries consumed too much in last 30Y, they’ve accumulated huge inflation-resistant assets under fiat debase
RT @JKSteinberger: Even more glad we wrote this one now. A wealth tax IS climate policy, everyone. It really is. 5/ https://t.co/S4Ydj11eyy