You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
New insights on Neolithic food and mobility patterns in Mediterranean coastal populations
|
---|---|
Published in |
American Journal of Physical Anthropology, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.1002/ajpa.24089 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gwenaëlle Goude, Domingo C. Salazar‐García, Robert C. Power, Maïté Rivollat, Lionel Gourichon, Marie‐France Deguilloux, Marie‐Hélène Pemonge, Laurent Bouby, Didier Binder |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 3 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
France | 1 | 8% |
Italy | 1 | 8% |
Ireland | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 92% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
Researcher | 7 | 13% |
Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 10 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,007,453
of 23,321,213 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Physical Anthropology
#1,039
of 3,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,738
of 399,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Physical Anthropology
#12
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,321,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.