↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility and physiological effects of prone positioning in non-intubated patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 (PRON-COVID): a prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
987 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
174 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
512 Mendeley
Title
Feasibility and physiological effects of prone positioning in non-intubated patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 (PRON-COVID): a prospective cohort study
Published in
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, August 2020
DOI 10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30268-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Coppo, Giacomo Bellani, Dario Winterton, Michela Di Pierro, Alessandro Soria, Paola Faverio, Matteo Cairo, Silvia Mori, Grazia Messinesi, Ernesto Contro, Paolo Bonfanti, Annalisa Benini, Maria Grazia Valsecchi, Laura Antolini, Giuseppe Foti

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 987 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 512 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 512 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 68 13%
Other 63 12%
Researcher 54 11%
Student > Master 52 10%
Student > Postgraduate 35 7%
Other 108 21%
Unknown 132 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 218 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 61 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 2%
Engineering 8 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 1%
Other 44 9%
Unknown 162 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 557. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2021.
All research outputs
#25,549
of 18,963,610 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#57
of 2,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,332
of 300,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#4
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,963,610 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.