↓ Skip to main content

Lung Function and Organ Dysfunctions in 178 Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation During The 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Pandemic

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lung Function and Organ Dysfunctions in 178 Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation During The 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Pandemic
Published in
Critical Care, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10369
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando G Ríos, Elisa Estenssoro, Fernando Villarejo, Ricardo Valentini, Liliana Aguilar, Daniel Pezzola, Pascual Valdez, Miguel Blasco, Cristina Orlandi, Javier Alvarez, Fernando Saldarini, Alejandro Gómez, Pablo E Gómez, Martin Deheza, Alan Zazu, Mónica Quinteros, Ariel Chena, Javier Osatnik, Damian Violi, Maria Eugenia Gonzalez, Guillermo Chiappero

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 102 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 20%
Student > Master 16 15%
Other 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Other 25 23%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 19 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,467
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,705
of 133,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#39
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.