↓ Skip to main content

Dying individuals and suffering populations: applying a population-level bioethics lens to palliative care in humanitarian contexts: before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Ethics, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
53 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
Title
Dying individuals and suffering populations: applying a population-level bioethics lens to palliative care in humanitarian contexts: before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic
Published in
Journal of Medical Ethics, June 2020
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2019-105943
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keona Jeane Wynne, Mila Petrova, Rachel Coghlan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 149 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Researcher 15 10%
Other 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 40 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 12%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Psychology 5 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 46 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2020.
All research outputs
#733,868
of 17,740,717 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#241
of 3,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,375
of 296,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#11
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,740,717 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,070 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.