You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Concordance of Sleep and Pain Outcomes of Diverse Interventions: An Umbrella Review
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0040891 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anthony G. Doufas, Orestis A. Panagiotou, John P. A. Ioannidis |
Abstract |
Pain influences sleep and vice versa. We performed an umbrella review of meta-analyses on treatments for diverse conditions in order to examine whether diverse medical treatments for different conditions have similar or divergent effects on pain and sleep. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Egypt | 2 | 50% |
Spain | 1 | 25% |
Canada | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 146 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 22 | 15% |
Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 7% |
Other | 37 | 25% |
Unknown | 31 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 28% |
Psychology | 18 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
Neuroscience | 8 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
Other | 26 | 17% |
Unknown | 36 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2012.
All research outputs
#12,664,757
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#97,871
of 193,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,319
of 143,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,936
of 4,020 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,020 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.