You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Genomic Convergence Analysis of Schizophrenia: mRNA Sequencing Reveals Altered Synaptic Vesicular Transport in Post-Mortem Cerebellum
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2008
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0003625 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joann Mudge, Neil A. Miller, Irina Khrebtukova, Ingrid E. Lindquist, Gregory D. May, Jim J. Huntley, Shujun Luo, Lu Zhang, Jennifer C. van Velkinburgh, Andrew D. Farmer, Sharon Lewis, William D. Beavis, Faye D. Schilkey, Selene M. Virk, C. Forrest Black, M. Kathy Myers, Lar C. Mader, Ray J. Langley, John P. Utsey, Ryan W. Kim, Rosalinda C. Roberts, Sat Kirpal Khalsa, Meredith Garcia, Victoria Ambriz-Griffith, Richard Harlan, Wendy Czika, Stanton Martin, Russell D. Wolfinger, Nora I. Perrone-Bizzozero, Gary P. Schroth, Stephen F. Kingsmore |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 120 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 42 | 32% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 24% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
Other | 23 | 18% |
Unknown | 14 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 40% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 10% |
Neuroscience | 11 | 8% |
Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 8% |
Unknown | 19 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2021.
All research outputs
#8,065,009
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#101,939
of 208,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,099
of 95,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#221
of 391 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 391 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.