You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003959.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tanis R Fenton, Heidi Al-Wassia, Shahirose S Premji, Reg S Sauve |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 239 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 12% |
| Researcher | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 15% |
| Unknown | 91 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Unknown | 105 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,812,351
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,944
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,314
of 434,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#107
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.