↓ Skip to main content

Optimization of de novo transcriptome assembly from high-throughput short read sequencing data improves functional annotation for non-model organisms

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimization of de novo transcriptome assembly from high-throughput short read sequencing data improves functional annotation for non-model organisms
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-13-170
Pubmed ID
Authors

Berat Z Haznedaroglu, Darryl Reeves, Hamid Rismani-Yazdi, Jordan Peccia

Abstract

The k-mer hash length is a key factor affecting the output of de novo transcriptome assembly packages using de Bruijn graph algorithms. Assemblies constructed with varying single k-mer choices might result in the loss of unique contiguous sequences (contigs) and relevant biological information. A common solution to this problem is the clustering of single k-mer assemblies. Even though annotation is one of the primary goals of a transcriptome assembly, the success of assembly strategies does not consider the impact of k-mer selection on the annotation output. This study provides an in-depth k-mer selection analysis that is focused on the degree of functional annotation achieved for a non-model organism where no reference genome information is available. Individual k-mers and clustered assemblies (CA) were considered using three representative software packages. Pair-wise comparison analyses (between individual k-mers and CAs) were produced to reveal missing Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) ortholog identifiers (KOIs), and to determine a strategy that maximizes the recovery of biological information in a de novo transcriptome assembly.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Sweden 2 1%
Norway 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 137 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 61 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 19%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 10 6%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 9 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 105 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 12%
Computer Science 10 6%
Engineering 4 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 12 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2016.
All research outputs
#3,209,671
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,162
of 7,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,954
of 164,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#14
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.