You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Curing Coma Campaign: Framing Initial Scientific Challenges—Proceedings of the First Curing Coma Campaign Scientific Advisory Council Meeting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurocritical Care, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12028-020-01028-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Javier Provencio, J. Claude Hemphill, Jan Claassen, Brian L. Edlow, Raimund Helbok, Paul M. Vespa, Michael N. Diringer, Len Polizzotto, Lori Shutter, Jose I. Suarez, Robert D. Stevens, Daniel F. Hanley, Yama Akbari, Thomas P. Bleck, Melanie Boly, Brandon Foreman, Joseph T. Giacino, Jed A. Hartings, Theresa Human, Daniel Kondziella, Geoffrey S. F. Ling, Stephan A. Mayer, Molly McNett, David K. Menon, Geert Meyfroidt, Martin M. Monti, Soojin Park, Nader Pouratian, Louis Puybasset, Benjamin Rohaut, Eric S. Rosenthal, Nicholas D. Schiff, Tarek Sharshar, Amy Wagner, John Whyte, DaiWai M. Olson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 27% |
| France | 5 | 15% |
| Belgium | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Guinea | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 70% |
| Scientists | 5 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 26% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 13 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#448,170
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Neurocritical Care
#21
of 1,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,982
of 437,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurocritical Care
#4
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.