↓ Skip to main content

The Paranoid Style in American Politics Revisited: An Ideological Asymmetry in Conspiratorial Thinking

Overview of attention for article published in Political Psychology, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 892)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
116 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
4 Redditors
Title
The Paranoid Style in American Politics Revisited: An Ideological Asymmetry in Conspiratorial Thinking
Published in
Political Psychology, June 2020
DOI 10.1111/pops.12681
Authors

Sander Linden, Costas Panagopoulos, Flávio Azevedo, John T. Jost

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 116 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2020.
All research outputs
#267,814
of 15,626,931 outputs
Outputs from Political Psychology
#40
of 892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,755
of 268,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Political Psychology
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,626,931 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.