You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Designs for clinical trials with time-to-event outcomes based on stopping guidelines for lack of benefit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-81 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick Royston, Friederike M-S Barthel, Mahesh KB Parmar, Babak Choodari-Oskooei, Valerie Isham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 67% |
| India | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 34% |
| Mathematics | 14 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,241,350
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#45
of 45 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,451
of 128,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.