RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
Essential reading.
RT @kenmomd: 経済再開に向けたスクリーニング検査の効果について、検査の頻度や感度、報告の遅れの違いを等をモデルを使用して検討した査読前論文。これまで定性的に語られることが多かった検査&隔離の効果を考える一助に。 @DanLarremore @michaelmina_…
This make sense. Testing for surveillance should have different priorities: turn around time, frequency and ease of testing being more important than limit-of-detection.
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @jhuber: Important pre-print from @DanLarremore that aligns with @OpenCovidScreen thesis on Return-to-Work/School "FFCE" surveillance te…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: 2. In this paper, the authors model viral load over the course of infection and compare the efficacy of mitigation using…
“These results demonstrate that effective surveillance, including time to first detection and outbreak control, depends largely on frequency of testing and the speed of reporting, and is only marginally improved by high test sensitivity.” https://t.co/7gNg
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Some new research on #COVID19 testing: Is test sensitivity overrated? @DanLarremore lays it out in this exceptional…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @gannbattemasenn: @kyoshimine 予算節約にもなりますよーって誰かがねじ込めば、物凄い勢いで推進しそうですけどね。この論文だと3日に1回のスクリニーングテストで1日1回のテストとほぼ同じ感染軽減効果はあるんで、これとプール検査を合わせれば 1人ず…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
@michaelmina_lab @peterlombard I’m surprised to see the talk about pooling. If it adds a day to reporting out the positives because you have to do a 2nd round of testing on positive pools, that’s a big problem. As you’re preprint shows, time to reporting r
@kyoshimine 予算節約にもなりますよーって誰かがねじ込めば、物凄い勢いで推進しそうですけどね。この論文だと3日に1回のスクリニーングテストで1日1回のテストとほぼ同じ感染軽減効果はあるんで、これとプール検査を合わせれば 1人ずつ検査よりもコストが下がるんですとかやればw https://t.co/VoM4OxRliQ
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
Great thread on #COVID19 testing 👇
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @gannbattemasenn: この、けんもうさんが紹介してくれたスクリーニング検査の論文、DeepL翻訳の助けを借りながら読んでいるけど、滅茶苦茶面白すいっすね。毎日スクリーニング検査と三日検査だと1%前後の差しかないが、一週間スクリーニングだと20%近く感染リスク…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Some new research on #COVID19 testing: Is test sensitivity overrated? @DanLarremore lays it out in this exceptional…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Some new research on #COVID19 testing: Is test sensitivity overrated? @DanLarremore lays it out in this exceptional…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @kenmomd: 経済再開に向けたスクリーニング検査の効果について、検査の頻度や感度、報告の遅れの違いを等をモデルを使用して検討した査読前論文。これまで定性的に語られることが多かった検査&隔離の効果を考える一助に。 @DanLarremore @michaelmina_…
RT @kenmomd: 経済再開に向けたスクリーニング検査の効果について、検査の頻度や感度、報告の遅れの違いを等をモデルを使用して検討した査読前論文。これまで定性的に語られることが多かった検査&隔離の効果を考える一助に。 @DanLarremore @michaelmina_…
RT @AdelinaCoHe: This study looks very useful for informing testing strategies in care homes...
この、けんもうさんが紹介してくれたスクリーニング検査の論文、DeepL翻訳の助けを借りながら読んでいるけど、滅茶苦茶面白すいっすね。毎日スクリーニング検査と三日検査だと1%前後の差しかないが、一週間スクリーニングだと20%近く感染リスクが上がる。 https://t.co/VoM4OxRliQ
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @kenmomd: 経済再開に向けたスクリーニング検査の効果について、検査の頻度や感度、報告の遅れの違いを等をモデルを使用して検討した査読前論文。これまで定性的に語られることが多かった検査&隔離の効果を考える一助に。 @DanLarremore @michaelmina_…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Some new research on #COVID19 testing: Is test sensitivity overrated? @DanLarremore lays it out in this exceptional…
RT @kearnsneuro: Really interesting preprint about trade-offs between limit of detection and testing speed and frequency. Perfect the enemy…
新型コロナの臨床診断ではなくサーベイランス目的の検査では“高い精度と感度”ではなく“報告の速さ”を重要にしても効果的なサーベイランスに与える影響は少ない。検出限界を犠牲にしても迅速で低コストで頻繁に行える代替検査を開発して使い分けるべきである。(プレプリント) https://t.co/WLYpoBxf3G
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
Really interesting preprint about trade-offs between limit of detection and testing speed and frequency. Perfect the enemy of prevention. Big implications for work places and schools if fast and cheap tests available.
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @AdelinaCoHe: This study looks very useful for informing testing strategies in care homes...
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Some new research on #COVID19 testing: Is test sensitivity overrated? @DanLarremore lays it out in this exceptional…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Some new research on #COVID19 testing: Is test sensitivity overrated? @DanLarremore lays it out in this exceptional…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Some new research on #COVID19 testing: Is test sensitivity overrated? @DanLarremore lays it out in this exceptional…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @kenmomd: 経済再開に向けたスクリーニング検査の効果について、検査の頻度や感度、報告の遅れの違いを等をモデルを使用して検討した査読前論文。これまで定性的に語られることが多かった検査&隔離の効果を考える一助に。 @DanLarremore @michaelmina_…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Some new research on #COVID19 testing: Is test sensitivity overrated? @DanLarremore lays it out in this exceptional…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
Surveillance testing of SARS-CoV-2 | medRxiv https://t.co/YoGYQ5AbTg #新型コロナウイルス
RT @kenmomd: 経済再開に向けたスクリーニング検査の効果について、検査の頻度や感度、報告の遅れの違いを等をモデルを使用して検討した査読前論文。これまで定性的に語られることが多かった検査&隔離の効果を考える一助に。 @DanLarremore @michaelmina_…
RT @AdelinaCoHe: This study looks very useful for informing testing strategies in care homes...
This study looks very useful for informing testing strategies in care homes...
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @kenmomd: 経済再開に向けたスクリーニング検査の効果について、検査の頻度や感度、報告の遅れの違いを等をモデルを使用して検討した査読前論文。これまで定性的に語られることが多かった検査&隔離の効果を考える一助に。 @DanLarremore @michaelmina_…
RT @COVID19arXiv: 𝗧𝗶𝘁𝗹𝗲: Surveillance testing of SARS-CoV-2. 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗿𝘀: Daniel B Larremore, Bryan Wilder, Evan Lester, Soraya Shehata, James…
RT @kenmomd: 経済再開に向けたスクリーニング検査の効果について、検査の頻度や感度、報告の遅れの違いを等をモデルを使用して検討した査読前論文。これまで定性的に語られることが多かった検査&隔離の効果を考える一助に。 @DanLarremore @michaelmina_…
RT @kenmomd: 経済再開に向けたスクリーニング検査の効果について、検査の頻度や感度、報告の遅れの違いを等をモデルを使用して検討した査読前論文。これまで定性的に語られることが多かった検査&隔離の効果を考える一助に。 @DanLarremore @michaelmina_…
経済再開に向けたスクリーニング検査の効果について、検査の頻度や感度、報告の遅れの違いを等をモデルを使用して検討した査読前論文。これまで定性的に語られることが多かった検査&隔離の効果を考える一助に。 @DanLarremore @michaelmina_lab @MilindTambe_AI https://t.co/9DpXV3DG5T
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: 2. In this paper, the authors model viral load over the course of infection and compare the efficacy of mitigation using…
@xMohakGupta Antigen based testing is actually a good strategy: https://t.co/Byyuzksuci
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
𝗧𝗶𝘁𝗹𝗲: Surveillance testing of SARS-CoV-2. 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗿𝘀: Daniel B Larremore, Bryan Wilder, Evan Lester, Soraya Shehata, James M Burke, James A Hay, Milind Tambe, Michael J Mina, Roy Parker https://t.co/68uPqJb1ST https://t.co/mfdySlver8
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Some new research on #COVID19 testing: Is test sensitivity overrated? @DanLarremore lays it out in this exceptional…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Some new research on #COVID19 testing: Is test sensitivity overrated? @DanLarremore lays it out in this exceptional…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Some new research on #COVID19 testing: Is test sensitivity overrated? @DanLarremore lays it out in this exceptional…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
Interesting study seems to show that even more testing, with rapid results, is needed.
RT @DiseaseEcology: Screening for University or school (or other group) re-openings? Fantastic new paper on a topic we've all been talking…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
Latest from our group on COVID-19 "Surveillance testing of SARS-CoV-2" examines tradeoff of more frequent & less sensitive tests vs less frequent & more sensitive tests, using agent-based & other models. Collaboration w @michaelmina_lab, @Dan
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: 13. @DanLarremore has a thread about is paper here: https://t.co/m6dsPq7EPz
Our new preprint on tradeoffs in surveillance testing for SARS-COV-2: is it better to have more frequent screening with a less sensitive test, or less frequent use of a more sensitive one? See this great explainer thread from @DanLarremore
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @DiseaseEcology: Screening for University or school (or other group) re-openings? Fantastic new paper on a topic we've all been talking…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Some new research on #COVID19 testing: Is test sensitivity overrated? @DanLarremore lays it out in this exceptional…
RT @DiseaseEcology: Screening for University or school (or other group) re-openings? Fantastic new paper on a topic we've all been talking…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Some new research on #COVID19 testing: Is test sensitivity overrated? @DanLarremore lays it out in this exceptional…
RT @DanLarremore: Preprint: Viral surveillance testing is crucial, but not all surveillance strategies are equal. We modeled the impacts of…