↓ Skip to main content

How Language Contributes to Stereotype Formation: Combined Effects of Label Types and Negation Use in Behavior Descriptions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Language & Social Psychology, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Language Contributes to Stereotype Formation: Combined Effects of Label Types and Negation Use in Behavior Descriptions
Published in
Journal of Language & Social Psychology, June 2020
DOI 10.1177/0261927x20933320
Authors

Christian Burgers, Camiel J. Beukeboom

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,979,745
of 15,520,561 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Language & Social Psychology
#146
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,500
of 230,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Language & Social Psychology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,520,561 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them