You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Loss of seton in patients with complex anal fistula: a retrospective comparison of conventional knotted loose seton and knot-free seton
|
---|---|
Published in |
Techniques in Coloproctology, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10151-020-02254-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
C. Verkade, D. D. E. Zimmerman, D. K. Wasowicz, S. W. Polle, H. S. de Vries |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | 14% |
Turkey | 2 | 10% |
Netherlands | 2 | 10% |
Ireland | 1 | 5% |
Italy | 1 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
Dominican Republic | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 24% |
Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 25% |
Other | 1 | 13% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
Researcher | 1 | 13% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 50% |
Psychology | 1 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,480,529
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#265
of 1,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,567
of 400,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#14
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.