You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Transcriptome Changes Affecting Hedgehog and Cytokine Signalling in the Umbilical Cord: Implications for Disease Risk
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0039744 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Walter Stünkel, Hong Pan, Siew Boom Chew, Emilia Tng, Jun Hao Tan, Li Chen, Roy Joseph, Clara Y. Cheong, Mei-Lyn Ong, Yung Seng Lee, Yap-Seng Chong, Seang Mei Saw, Michael J. Meaney, Kenneth Kwek, Allan M. Sheppard, Peter D. Gluckman, GUSTO Study Group, Joanna D. Holbrook |
Abstract |
Babies born at lower gestational ages or smaller birthweights have a greater risk of poorer health in later life. Both the causes of these sub-optimal birth outcomes and the mechanism by which the effects are transmitted over decades are the subject of extensive study. We investigated whether a transcriptomic signature of either birthweight or gestational age could be detected in umbilical cord RNA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Singapore | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 73 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
Researcher | 9 | 12% |
Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Other | 16 | 22% |
Unknown | 14 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 28% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 14% |
Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,827,991
of 25,507,011 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#105,632
of 222,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,716
of 178,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,451
of 3,964 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,507,011 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,964 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.