↓ Skip to main content

Potassium binders for chronic hyperkalaemia in people with chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potassium binders for chronic hyperkalaemia in people with chronic kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013165.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrizia Natale, Suetonia C Palmer, Marinella Ruospo, Valeria M Saglimbene, Giovanni FM Strippoli

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,010,915
of 15,867,025 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,746
of 11,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,579
of 292,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,867,025 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.