You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Drought‐induced shifts in the floristic and functional composition of tropical forests in Ghana
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecology Letters, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01834.x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sophie Fauset, Timothy R. Baker, Simon L. Lewis, Ted R. Feldpausch, Kofi Affum‐Baffoe, Ernest G. Foli, Keith C. Hamer, Michael D. Swaine |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 1 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 437 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
Brazil | 4 | <1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Panama | 1 | <1% |
Ghana | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | <1% |
Unknown | 411 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 93 | 21% |
Researcher | 85 | 19% |
Student > Master | 64 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 25 | 6% |
Other | 80 | 18% |
Unknown | 64 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 152 | 35% |
Environmental Science | 151 | 35% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 22 | 5% |
Engineering | 8 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 1% |
Other | 24 | 5% |
Unknown | 75 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,314,561
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#735
of 3,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,175
of 180,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#6
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.