↓ Skip to main content

Posicionamento da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia para Gravidez e Planejamento Familiar na Mulher Portadora de Cardiopatia – 2020

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Posicionamento da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia para Gravidez e Planejamento Familiar na Mulher Portadora de Cardiopatia – 2020
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, May 2020
DOI 10.36660/abc.20200406
Pubmed ID
Authors

Walkiria Samuel Avila, Elizabeth Regina Giunco Alexandre, Marildes Luiza de Castro, Alexandre Jorge Gomes de Lucena, Celi Marques-Santos, Claudia Maria Vilas Freire, Eduardo Giusti Rossi, Felipe Favorette Campanharo, Ivan Romero Rivera, Maria Elizabeth Navegantes Caetano Costa, Maria Alayde Mendonça Rivera, Regina Coeli Marques de Carvalho, Alexandre Abzaid, Antonio Fernandes Moron, Auristela Isabel de Oliveira Ramos, Carlos Japhet da Mata Albuquerque, Claudine Maia Alves Feio, Daniel Born, Fábio Bruno da Silva, Fernando Souza Nani, Flavio Tarasoutchi, José de Ribamar Costa Junior, José Xavier de Melo Filho, Leila Katz, Maria Cristina Costa Almeida, Max Grinberg, Melania Maria Ramos de Amorim, Nilson Roberto de Melo, Orlando Otávio de Medeiros, Pablo Maria Alberto Pomerantzeff, Sérgio Luiz Navarro Braga, Sonia Conde Cristino, Tania Leme da Rocha Martinez, Tatiana de Carvalho Andreuci Torres Leal

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 18%
Other 6 7%
Student > Master 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Researcher 3 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 44 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 45 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2021.
All research outputs
#17,467,675
of 25,623,883 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#527
of 1,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,253
of 426,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,623,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,216 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.