↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Diet and/or Exercise in Enhancing Spinal Cord Sensorimotor Learning

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Diet and/or Exercise in Enhancing Spinal Cord Sensorimotor Learning
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0041288
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Selvan Joseph, Zhe Ying, Yumei Zhuang, Hui Zhong, Aiguo Wu, Harsharan S. Bhatia, Rusvelda Cruz, Niranjala J. K. Tillakaratne, Roland R. Roy, V. Reggie Edgerton, Fernando Gomez-Pinilla

Abstract

Given that the spinal cord is capable of learning sensorimotor tasks and that dietary interventions can influence learning involving supraspinal centers, we asked whether the presence of omega-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and the curry spice curcumin (Cur) by themselves or in combination with voluntary exercise could affect spinal cord learning in adult spinal mice. Using an instrumental learning paradigm to assess spinal learning we observed that mice fed a diet containing DHA/Cur performed better in the spinal learning paradigm than mice fed a diet deficient in DHA/Cur. The enhanced performance was accompanied by increases in the mRNA levels of molecular markers of learning, i.e., BDNF, CREB, CaMKII, and syntaxin 3. Concurrent exposure to exercise was complementary to the dietary treatment effects on spinal learning. The diet containing DHA/Cur resulted in higher levels of DHA and lower levels of omega-6 fatty acid arachidonic acid (AA) in the spinal cord than the diet deficient in DHA/Cur. The level of spinal learning was inversely related to the ratio of AA:DHA. These results emphasize the capacity of select dietary factors and exercise to foster spinal cord learning. Given the non-invasiveness and safety of the modulation of diet and exercise, these interventions should be considered in light of their potential to enhance relearning of sensorimotor tasks during rehabilitative training paradigms after a spinal cord injury.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Unknown 67 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Professor 6 9%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 13%
Neuroscience 9 13%
Sports and Recreations 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2013.
All research outputs
#5,829,053
of 23,402,852 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#73,815
of 200,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,944
of 165,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,120
of 3,963 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,402,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,963 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.