You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is Handgrip Strength a Useful Measure to Evaluate Lower Limb Strength and Functional Performance in Older Women?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s253262 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andre Luiz Felix Rodacki, Natália Boneti Moreira, Arthur Pitta, Renata Wolf, Jarbas Melo Filho, Cintia de Lourdes Nahhas Rodacki, Gleber Pereira |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 27% |
| Brazil | 2 | 18% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
| Italy | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Chile | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 73% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 34 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 40 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,409,395
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#563
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,848
of 433,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#8
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.