You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementing structured, multiprofessional medical ethical decision-making in a neonatal intensive care unit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Ethics, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1136/medethics-2011-100250 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacoba de Boer, Geja van Blijderveen, Gert van Dijk, Hugo J Duivenvoorden, Monique Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 16% |
| Psychology | 11 | 13% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2021.
All research outputs
#14,161,173
of 24,383,935 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#2,603
of 3,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,483
of 168,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#16
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,383,935 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.