↓ Skip to main content

Reducing childhood obesity by eliminating 100% fruit juice.

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Public Health, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reducing childhood obesity by eliminating 100% fruit juice.
Published in
American Journal of Public Health, July 2012
DOI 10.2105/ajph.2012.300719
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janet M. Wojcicki, Melvin B. Heyman

Abstract

The Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 presents an opportunity to change the nutritional quality of foods served in low-income childcare centers, including Head Start centers. Excessive fruit juice consumption is associated with increased risk for obesity. Moreover, there is recent scientific evidence that sucrose consumption without the corresponding fiber, as is commonly present in fruit juice, is associated with the metabolic syndrome, liver injury, and obesity. Given the increasing risk of obesity among preschool children, we recommend that the US Department of Agriculture's Child and Adult Food Care Program, which manages the meal patterns in childcare centers such as Head Start, promote the elimination of fruit juice in favor of whole fruit for children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 241 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Lebanon 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 186 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 25%
Student > Bachelor 34 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Researcher 15 8%
Other 12 6%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 37 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 16%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Psychology 6 3%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 38 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 394. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2023.
All research outputs
#79,152
of 25,916,093 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Public Health
#265
of 12,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273
of 178,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Public Health
#3
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,916,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.