↓ Skip to main content

The Age-Related Risk of Co-Existing Meningitis in Children with Urinary Tract Infection

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Age-Related Risk of Co-Existing Meningitis in Children with Urinary Tract Infection
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0026576
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc Tebruegge, Anastasia Pantazidou, Vanessa Clifford, Gena Gonis, Nicole Ritz, Tom Connell, Nigel Curtis

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to determine age-stratified rates of co-existing bacterial meningitis in children with urinary tract infection (UTI). The secondary aims of this study were to determine the causative pathogens of UTI, and the clinical features and outcome of children with co-existing meningitis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 78 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 18 23%
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 20 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 54%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 24 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,622,280
of 24,764,450 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#47,057
of 214,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,436
of 147,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#469
of 2,650 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,764,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,650 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.