↓ Skip to main content

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for medical applications

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 1,403)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
619 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for medical applications
Published in
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10856-016-5731-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivan Vladislavov Panayotov, Valérie Orti, Frédéric Cuisinier, Jacques Yachouh

Abstract

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a polyaromatic semi-crystalline thermoplastic polymer with mechanical properties favorable for bio-medical applications. Polyetheretherketone forms: PEEK-LT1, PEEK-LT2, and PEEK-LT3 have already been applied in different surgical fields: spine surgery, orthopedic surgery, maxillo-facial surgery etc. Synthesis of PEEK composites broadens the physicochemical and mechanical properties of PEEK materials. To improve their osteoinductive and antimicrobial capabilities, different types of functionalization of PEEK surfaces and changes in PEEK structure were proposed. PEEK based materials are becoming an important group of biomaterials used for bone and cartilage replacement as well as in a large number of diverse medical fields. The current paper describes the structural changes and the surface functionalization of PEEK materials and their most common biomedical applications. The possibility to use these materials in 3D printing process could increase the scientific interest and their future development as well.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 619 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 617 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 98 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 12%
Student > Bachelor 59 10%
Researcher 57 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 5%
Other 89 14%
Unknown 215 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 132 21%
Engineering 118 19%
Materials Science 52 8%
Chemistry 15 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 1%
Other 51 8%
Unknown 244 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,426,445
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#19
of 1,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,214
of 339,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,403 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.