You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The aphrodisiac herb Carpolobia: A biopharmacological and phytochemical review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pharmacognosy Reviews, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.4103/0973-7847.162128 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucky Lebgosi Nwidu, Paul Alozie Nwafor, Wagner Vilegas |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 17% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 25 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Pharmacognosy Reviews
#106
of 165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,382
of 359,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmacognosy Reviews
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.