↓ Skip to main content

Ecological consequences of human niche construction: Examining long-term anthropogenic shaping of global species distributions

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
46 news outlets
blogs
12 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
146 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
1018 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ecological consequences of human niche construction: Examining long-term anthropogenic shaping of global species distributions
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2016
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1525200113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole L. Boivin, Melinda A. Zeder, Dorian Q. Fuller, Alison Crowther, Greger Larson, Jon M. Erlandson, Tim Denham, Michael D. Petraglia

Abstract

The exhibition of increasingly intensive and complex niche construction behaviors through time is a key feature of human evolution, culminating in the advanced capacity for ecosystem engineering exhibited by Homo sapiens A crucial outcome of such behaviors has been the dramatic reshaping of the global biosphere, a transformation whose early origins are increasingly apparent from cumulative archaeological and paleoecological datasets. Such data suggest that, by the Late Pleistocene, humans had begun to engage in activities that have led to alterations in the distributions of a vast array of species across most, if not all, taxonomic groups. Changes to biodiversity have included extinctions, extirpations, and shifts in species composition, diversity, and community structure. We outline key examples of these changes, highlighting findings from the study of new datasets, like ancient DNA (aDNA), stable isotopes, and microfossils, as well as the application of new statistical and computational methods to datasets that have accumulated significantly in recent decades. We focus on four major phases that witnessed broad anthropogenic alterations to biodiversity-the Late Pleistocene global human expansion, the Neolithic spread of agriculture, the era of island colonization, and the emergence of early urbanized societies and commercial networks. Archaeological evidence documents millennia of anthropogenic transformations that have created novel ecosystems around the world. This record has implications for ecological and evolutionary research, conservation strategies, and the maintenance of ecosystem services, pointing to a significant need for broader cross-disciplinary engagement between archaeology and the biological and environmental sciences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 146 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,018 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 1%
Portugal 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 10 <1%
Unknown 975 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 229 22%
Researcher 191 19%
Student > Master 153 15%
Student > Bachelor 93 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 56 6%
Other 148 15%
Unknown 148 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 290 28%
Environmental Science 203 20%
Arts and Humanities 87 9%
Social Sciences 82 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 44 4%
Other 107 11%
Unknown 205 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 513. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2023.
All research outputs
#50,671
of 25,802,847 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,310
of 103,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,026
of 356,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#33
of 876 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,802,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 876 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.