| Title |
Global health activists’ lessons on building social movements for Health for All
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12939-020-01232-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Connie Musolino, Fran Baum, Toby Freeman, Ronald Labonté, Chiara Bodini, David Sanders |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 15% |
| Australia | 4 | 8% |
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 54% |
| Scientists | 11 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Librarian | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 27% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 13 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#960,333
of 24,178,331 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#115
of 2,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,016
of 400,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#9
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,178,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.