↓ Skip to main content

“Fake News Is Anything They Say!” — Conceptualization and Weaponization of Fake News among the American Public

Overview of attention for article published in Mass Communication and Society, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 512)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
54 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“Fake News Is Anything They Say!” — Conceptualization and Weaponization of Fake News among the American Public
Published in
Mass Communication and Society, July 2020
DOI 10.1080/15205436.2020.1789661
Authors

Chau Tong, Hyungjin Gill, Jianing Li, Sebastián Valenzuela, Hernando Rojas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 20%
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 7 8%
Professor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 24 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 36 41%
Arts and Humanities 9 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 27 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#848,791
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Mass Communication and Society
#26
of 512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,662
of 427,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mass Communication and Society
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.