↓ Skip to main content

Using Conjoint Analysis and Choice Experiments to Estimate QALY Values

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using Conjoint Analysis and Choice Experiments to Estimate QALY Values
Published in
PharmacoEconomics, October 2012
DOI 10.2165/11535660-000000000-00000
Pubmed ID
Authors

Terry N. Flynn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 64 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Master 11 16%
Other 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 19 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 18%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2015.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#382
of 1,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,665
of 192,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#84
of 726 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 726 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.