↓ Skip to main content

Blaming climate change? How Indian mainstream media covered two extreme weather events in 2015

Overview of attention for article published in Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blaming climate change? How Indian mainstream media covered two extreme weather events in 2015
Published in
Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, July 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102119
Authors

James Painter, Shannon Osaka, Joshua Ettinger, Peter Walton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 31%
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 5 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2020.
All research outputs
#812,492
of 16,039,061 outputs
Outputs from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#316
of 1,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,651
of 292,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#10
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,039,061 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.