You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Differences in Pathological Composition Among Large Artery Occlusion Cerebral Thrombi, Valvular Heart Disease Atrial Thrombi and Carotid Endarterectomy Plaques
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2020.00811 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yu Liao, Min Guan, Dan Liang, Yingying Shi, Jialin Liu, Xiuli Zeng, Shengming Huang, Xiaomei Xie, Dingxin Yuan, Hongyu Qiao, Li'an Huang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 20% |
Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
India | 1 | 10% |
Japan | 1 | 10% |
Vietnam | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 29% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 13 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,423,313
of 24,378,498 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#1,238
of 13,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,243
of 402,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#108
of 498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,378,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.