↓ Skip to main content

The pathway of cell dismantling during programmed cell death in lace plant (Aponogeton madagascariensis) leaves

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 1,566)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 tweeters
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The pathway of cell dismantling during programmed cell death in lace plant (Aponogeton madagascariensis) leaves
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-12-115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaime Wertman, Christina EN Lord, Adrian N Dauphinee, Arunika HLAN Gunawardena

Abstract

Developmentally regulated programmed cell death (PCD) is the controlled death of cells that occurs throughout the life cycle of both plants and animals. The lace plant (Aponogeton madagascariensis) forms perforations between longitudinal and transverse veins in spaces known as areoles, via developmental PCD; cell death begins in the center of these areoles and develops towards the margin, creating a gradient of PCD. This gradient was examined using both long- and short-term live cell imaging, in addition to histochemical staining, in order to establish the order of cellular events that occur during PCD.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 33%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 7 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2012.
All research outputs
#750,475
of 12,410,450 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#32
of 1,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,060
of 121,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,410,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,566 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.