You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence Synthesis International (ESI): Position Statement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01415-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Gough, Phil Davies, Gro Jamtvedt, Etienne Langlois, Julia Littell, Tamara Lotfi, Edoardo Masset, Tracy Merlin, Andrew S. Pullin, Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga, John-Arne Røttingen, Emily Sena, Ruth Stewart, David Tovey, Howard White, Jennifer Yost, Hans Lund, Jeremy Grimshaw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 19% |
| Canada | 9 | 10% |
| Norway | 7 | 8% |
| South Africa | 4 | 4% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 36 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 63% |
| Scientists | 24 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 19% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Librarian | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 23% |
| Unknown | 16 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#700,756
of 25,468,708 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#86
of 2,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,268
of 430,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#4
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.