You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
煙硝づくり『古土法』の史学調査と実験的検証について
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Yakushigaku zasshi The Journal of Japanese history of pharmacy, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.34531/jjhp.54.2_94 |
| Authors |
野澤 直美, 高木 翔太, 渡邉 哲司, 風間 竜之介, 小沼（中村） 実香, 村橋 毅, 高野 文英 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 22 | 33% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 65 | 98% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2021.
All research outputs
#845,193
of 25,801,916 outputs
Outputs from Yakushigaku zasshi The Journal of Japanese history of pharmacy
#2
of 72 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,097
of 433,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Yakushigaku zasshi The Journal of Japanese history of pharmacy
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,801,916 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 72 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.