You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Description of Dientamoeba fragilis Cyst and Precystic Forms from Human Samples
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1128/jcm.00813-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D Stark, L S Garcia, J L N Barratt, O Phillips, T Roberts, D Marriott, J Harkness, J T Ellis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
#5,840
of 14,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,017
of 246,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
#37
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.