↓ Skip to main content

Design and Construction of “Synthetic Species”

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
49 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
14 Google+ users
pinterest
2 Pinners

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Design and Construction of “Synthetic Species”
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0039054
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eduardo Moreno

Abstract

Synthetic biology is an area of biological research that combines science and engineering. Here, I merge the principles of synthetic biology and regulatory evolution to create a new species with a minimal set of known elements. Using preexisting transgenes and recessive mutations of Drosophila melanogaster, a transgenic population arises with small eyes and a different venation pattern that fulfils the criteria of a new species according to Mayr's Biological Species Concept. The population described here is the first transgenic organism that cannot hybridize with the original wild type population but remains fertile when crossed with other identical transgenic animals. I therefore propose the term "synthetic species" to distinguish it from "natural species", not only because it has been created by genetic manipulation, but also because it may never be able to survive outside the laboratory environment. The use of genetic engineering to design artificial species barriers could help us understand natural speciation and may have practical applications. For instance, the transition from transgenic organisms towards synthetic species could constitute a safety mechanism to avoid the hybridization of genetically modified animals with wild type populations, preserving biodiversity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 111 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 23%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 8 7%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 6 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 18%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Engineering 4 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 9 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2022.
All research outputs
#392,927
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#5,538
of 224,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,814
of 179,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#68
of 3,985 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,985 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.