↓ Skip to main content

Silibinin Inhibits HIV-1 Infection by Reducing Cellular Activation and Proliferation

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Silibinin Inhibits HIV-1 Infection by Reducing Cellular Activation and Proliferation
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0041832
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janela McClure, Erica S. Lovelace, Shokrollah Elahi, Nicholas J. Maurice, Jessica Wagoner, Joan Dragavon, John E. Mittler, Zane Kraft, Leonidis Stamatatos, Helen Horton, Stephen C. De Rosa, Robert W. Coombs, Stephen J. Polyak

Abstract

Purified silymarin-derived natural products from the milk thistle plant (Silybum marianum) block hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and inhibit T cell proliferation in vitro. An intravenous formulation of silibinin (SIL), a major component of silymarin, displays anti-HCV effects in humans and also inhibits T-cell proliferation in vitro. We show that SIL inhibited replication of HIV-1 in TZM-bl cells, PBMCs, and CEM cells in vitro. SIL suppression of HIV-1 coincided with dose-dependent reductions in actively proliferating CD19+, CD4+, and CD8+ cells, resulting in fewer CD4+ T cells expressing the HIV-1 co-receptors CXCR4 and CCR5. SIL inhibition of T-cell growth was not due to cytotoxicity measured by cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, or necrosis. SIL also blocked induction of the activation markers CD38, HLA-DR, Ki67, and CCR5 on CD4+ T cells. The data suggest that SIL attenuated cellular functions involved in T-cell activation, proliferation, and HIV-1 infection. Silymarin-derived compounds provide cytoprotection by suppressing virus infection, immune activation, and inflammation, and as such may be relevant for both HIV mono-infected and HIV/HCV co-infected subjects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 25%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Professor 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 12 23%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2012.
All research outputs
#15,247,248
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#129,827
of 193,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,485
of 164,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,595
of 3,986 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,986 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.