| Title |
Update I. A systematic review on the efficacy and safety of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Critical Care, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.06.019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Cortegiani, Mariachiara Ippolito, Giulia Ingoglia, Pasquale Iozzo, Antonino Giarratano, Sharon Einav |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 14% |
| Brazil | 3 | 8% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
| Scientists | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 268 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 7% |
| Researcher | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 12% |
| Unknown | 127 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 30 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 28 | 10% |
| Unknown | 141 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,323,921
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Critical Care
#127
of 2,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,867
of 430,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Critical Care
#6
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.