You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Origins of food crops connect countries worldwide
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rspb.2016.0792 |
| Authors |
Colin K. Khoury, Harold A. Achicanoy, Anne D. Bjorkman, Carlos Navarro-Racines, Luigi Guarino, Ximena Flores-Palacios, Johannes M. M. Engels, John H. Wiersema, Hannes Dempewolf, Steven Sotelo, Julian Ramírez-Villegas, Nora P. Castañeda-Álvarez, Cary Fowler, Andy Jarvis, Loren H. Rieseberg, Paul C. Struik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,150 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 183 | 16% |
| United States | 142 | 12% |
| Canada | 34 | 3% |
| France | 34 | 3% |
| Australia | 29 | 3% |
| Spain | 26 | 2% |
| Germany | 18 | 2% |
| Mexico | 18 | 2% |
| India | 16 | 1% |
| Other | 197 | 17% |
| Unknown | 453 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 842 | 73% |
| Scientists | 232 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 43 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 31 | 3% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 555 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 536 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 132 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 97 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 67 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 10% |
| Other | 33 | 6% |
| Other | 85 | 15% |
| Unknown | 88 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 249 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 73 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 28 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 66 | 12% |
| Unknown | 103 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1408. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#9,057
of 25,867,969 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#11
of 11,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106
of 369,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#1
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,867,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.