↓ Skip to main content

Origins of food crops connect countries worldwide

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 5,770)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
74 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
twitter
578 tweeters
facebook
36 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 video uploader

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Origins of food crops connect countries worldwide
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, June 2016
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2016.0792
Authors

Colin K. Khoury, Harold A. Achicanoy, Anne D. Bjorkman, Carlos Navarro-Racines, Luigi Guarino, Ximena Flores-Palacios, Johannes M. M. Engels, John H. Wiersema, Hannes Dempewolf, Steven Sotelo, Julian Ramírez-Villegas, Nora P. Castañeda-Álvarez, Cary Fowler, Andy Jarvis, Loren H. Rieseberg, Paul C. Struik, Khoury, Colin K., Achicanoy, Harold A, Bjorkman, Anne D, Navarro-Racines, Carlos, Guarino, Luigi, Flores-Palacios, Ximena, Engels, Johannes M.M., Wiersema, John H, Dempewolf, Hannes, Sotelo, Steven, Ramirez-Villegas, Julian, Castañeda-Álvarez, Nora P., Fowler, Cary, Jarvis, Andy, Rieseberg, Loren H, Struik, Paul C.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 578 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 5%
France 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 117 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 28%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 59%
Environmental Science 22 16%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 5%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 14 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1099. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,314
of 7,947,684 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#2
of 5,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124
of 269,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#1
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,947,684 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.