↓ Skip to main content

Correlation between In Vivo Biofilm Formation and Virulence Gene Expression in Escherichia coli O104:H4

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correlation between In Vivo Biofilm Formation and Virulence Gene Expression in Escherichia coli O104:H4
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0041628
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rim Al Safadi, Galeb S. Abu-Ali, Rudolph E. Sloup, James T. Rudrik, Christopher M. Waters, Kathryn A. Eaton, Shannon D. Manning

Abstract

The emergence of novel pathogens poses a major public health threat causing widespread epidemics in susceptible populations. The Escherichia coli O104:H4 strain implicated in a 2011 outbreak in northern Germany caused the highest frequency of hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) and death ever recorded in a single E. coli outbreak. Therefore, it has been suggested that this strain is more virulent than other pathogenic E. coli (e.g., E. coli O157:H7). The E. coli O104:H4 outbreak strain possesses multiple virulence factors from both Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing E. coli (STEC) and enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), though the mechanism of pathogenesis is not known. Here, we demonstrate that E. coli O104:H4 produces a stable biofilm in vitro and that in vivo virulence gene expression is highest when E. coli O104:H4 overexpresses genes required for aggregation and exopolysaccharide production, a characteristic of bacterial cells residing within an established biofilm. Interrupting exopolysaccharide production and biofilm formation may therefore represent effective strategies for combating future E. coli O104:H4 infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Ghana 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 76 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 27%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 13 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2012.
All research outputs
#3,246,392
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#42,677
of 193,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,483
of 164,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#734
of 3,986 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,986 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.