You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Empirical Validation of Pooled Whole Genome Population Re-Sequencing in Drosophila melanogaster
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0041901 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuan Zhu, Alan O. Bergland, Josefa González, Dmitri A. Petrov |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 3 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 178 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 29% |
| Researcher | 49 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 121 | 62% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 20 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#105,188
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,444
of 181,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,400
of 4,009 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,009 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.