↓ Skip to main content

The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Biology, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
224 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
291 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity
Published in
PLoS Biology, July 2020
DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Moher, Lex Bouter, Sabine Kleinert, Paul Glasziou, Mai Har Sham, Virginia Barbour, Anne-Marie Coriat, Nicole Foeger, Ulrich Dirnagl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 518 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 291 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 11%
Student > Master 25 9%
Other 24 8%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Other 73 25%
Unknown 78 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 40 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 11%
Psychology 14 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 4%
Other 91 31%
Unknown 89 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 566. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#43,019
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#100
of 9,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,747
of 430,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#2
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.