| Title |
The Lancet–Chatham House Commission on improving population health post COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31184-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harry Rutter, Richard Horton, Theresa M Marteau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 141 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 59 | 42% |
| United States | 10 | 7% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Ireland | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 49 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 64 | 45% |
| Scientists | 45 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 28 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 25 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 21% |
| Unknown | 29 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#398,312
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#3,929
of 42,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,383
of 430,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#115
of 326 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 326 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.