↓ Skip to main content

Respiratory mechanics and gas exchanges in the early course of COVID-19 ARDS: a hypothesis-generating study

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Respiratory mechanics and gas exchanges in the early course of COVID-19 ARDS: a hypothesis-generating study
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13613-020-00716-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

J.-L. Diehl, N. Peron, R. Chocron, B. Debuc, E. Guerot, C. Hauw-Berlemont, B. Hermann, J. L. Augy, R. Younan, A. Novara, J. Langlais, L. Khider, N. Gendron, G. Goudot, J.-F. Fagon, T. Mirault, D. M. Smadja

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Other 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Master 12 9%
Researcher 11 8%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 40 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Psychology 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 50 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2020.
All research outputs
#14,526,137
of 25,599,531 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#807
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,337
of 429,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#29
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,599,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.