↓ Skip to main content

Cellular Organization of Neuroimmune Interactions in the Gastrointestinal Tract

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Immunology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cellular Organization of Neuroimmune Interactions in the Gastrointestinal Tract
Published in
Trends in Immunology, June 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.it.2016.05.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kara Gross Margolis, Michael David Gershon, Milena Bogunovic

Abstract

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is the largest immune organ; in vertebrates, it is the only organ whose function is controlled by its own intrinsic enteric nervous system (ENS), but it is additionally regulated by extrinsic (sympathetic and parasympathetic) neural innervation. The GI nervous and immune systems are highly integrated in their common goal, which is to unite digestive functions with protection from ingested environmental threats. This review discusses the physiological relevance of enteric neuroimmune integration by summarizing the current knowledge of evolutionary and developmental pathways, cellular organization, and molecular mechanisms of neuroimmune interactions in health and disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 154 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 21%
Researcher 28 18%
Student > Master 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 37 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 23 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 12%
Neuroscience 18 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 11%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 47 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2017.
All research outputs
#5,210,739
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Immunology
#939
of 2,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,856
of 357,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Immunology
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.