↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of Dog Training With and Without Remote Electronic Collars vs. a Focus on Positive Reinforcement

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 8,269)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
63 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
180 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of Dog Training With and Without Remote Electronic Collars vs. a Focus on Positive Reinforcement
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, July 2020
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2020.00508
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucy China, Daniel S. Mills, Jonathan J. Cooper

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 180 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 178 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Student > Master 22 12%
Other 18 10%
Researcher 8 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 4%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 79 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 26 15%
Psychology 5 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 87 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 672. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#32,464
of 25,905,864 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#8
of 8,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,334
of 431,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#2
of 291 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,905,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 291 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.